Skip to main content

How is help sent our way?

We are usually unaware of the energy we emit. The emission of energies reflects the state of matter and in us humans' state of mind. We are what we experience, internalize, and respond to.

What we experience, acts as a stimulus to how we feel and eventually how we respond. What we don't realize is this between stimulus and response there is space. It's vital to be cognizant of that space. The absence of space between stimulus and response creates a reaction. The presence of space between them creates a response. 

There is a subtle and yet very important difference between the two. The reaction is usually a spontaneous expression of how we felt as an individual. A response comprises of consumption of our feelings, understanding of facts and circumstances, and internal check of validity and relevance of our action.

The reaction thus creates emphatic energy around how we felt. Response creates accommodative energy around what is the right thing to do. The same situation makes different people emit different energies based on the presence and absence of a space between stimulus and response.

The reaction often emits a demand. The demand for certain action, behavior, or support. A response on the hand emits a request. A request for a certain action, accommodation, participation, or changes.

The reaction results in reluctant help being offered, of course with all good intentions but yet with a knowledge that we are catering to demand. We also likely witness a sense of entitlement and no sense of responsibility.

A response on the other hand results in an understandably lending of a helping hand, with a knowledge that we are engaging someone who cares about development and has an understanding of how it will benefit them and what their responsibilities in return are.

Different between a reaction to a stimulus and a response to a stimulus is minor. It's whether or not there is a space for thinking through where are at.

Have you thought about using space in this manner? Is the large enough to create a response? Perhaps worth a thought.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Choking the communication channel.

There are instances where everything looks in order. Structures are rightly in place. Right roles are defined. Responsibilities are distributed. Bi-directional open communication is expected to take place. And with that, collective work is expected to turn out productive. Yet, when the action begins, everything breaks apart. Productivity dwindles, cooperation is missing, and ad-hoc interactions are common-place That creates chaos. No one appears in charge even though there is someone responsible. It clearly is a sign of broken communication channels. A well-orchestrated workplace focuses on methods to communicate grounds-up and top-down. It encourages patient listening, internalizing and responding rather than reacting. All effective open communication channels are a result of making such communication possible. Often, the structures are set such that you centralize communication of every bit of your activity to someone in the hierarchy. Over time it turns into a permission-based inter...

Top up.

An effort of any kind will stop without a top-up mechanism. The cooking range doesn't work without gas. When petrol runs out, vehicles don't work. In the absence of solar panels, green energy is just a dream. Such issues apply to us humans too. Our ability to work hampers seriously if we don't have an energy replenishment plan. We think we enjoy the most when we do work involving our passions. We think tirelessly doing the same activity will keep our enthusiasm. Like writer's block, there comes a day when our ideas don't work. Monotony dries up the fun. What used to be the reason to be at work feels like the most dreaded place. When we encounter such a situation, it's time to check if our energy tank is emptying out fast enough that we need to land to refuel. Top up is a vital periodic part that recharges us. Different activities, places or people might refuel us with new energy and ideas. But first, be open to knowing you will run out of fuel. Sooner or later, ...

Checks and balances!

Defining a good purpose, setting a target goal and getting people working on them is usually not enough! There are too many aspects involved in getting the results we want. For example, there is an aspect of painting the big picture, working on motivation management, productivity tracking, building experimentation labs, and erecting resilient systems that systematize the workflows. Just putting bodies to work and defining milestones rarely achieves the right results. The other aspects that help march towards the milestones in an orderly manner, they are equally important. At the very least, they make objectives widely understandable and results more attainable. The job of a thought leader is to enable progress and enable recovery. Therefore, it is never enough to have just ideas. Those with ideas also have the responsibility to assemble the work environment in such a way as to create situations containing the energy disperses. Energy dispersal from lack of clarity, loss of motivation, ...