Skip to main content

Opposition is earned. Or not.

We are faced with opposition when we have a differing point of view. A differing point of view is due to our personal biases. How strongly we hold our biases determines how strong an opposition we are likely to see. Opposition is a formidable force against progress. It makes our minds think of ways to stall the progress simply in favor of maintaining our biases.

An open mind often softens the blow we receive due to opposition. An open mind is a reflection of the ability to listen independently of your own point of view. An open mind is willing to accommodate others' thoughts or plan for what to do. An open mind can thus provide a huge leap and means to progress.

Does it mean that we are faced with unrelenting opposition when we do not notice the traffic (communication) in the other direction? Definitely. We draw opposition to our own approach to sending information without others' context and processing the received information without their context. 

Factually the information we have may be better and more useful than that of others. And hence it may very well be a better choice to enable progress on what is on our hand at that very moment.

If the cost of that choice ends up alienating us from those who care about our project then the choice is perhaps not worth it.

After all most of our projects are not life-altering and life-threatening so we need not hold our point of view so dearly.

There are circumstances where conceding the point of view even when it is likely to fail is perfectly ok.

Because in exchange we earn someone else's trust for the long-term goal and that is precious earning.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Choking the communication channel.

There are instances where everything looks in order. Structures are rightly in place. Right roles are defined. Responsibilities are distributed. Bi-directional open communication is expected to take place. And with that, collective work is expected to turn out productive. Yet, when the action begins, everything breaks apart. Productivity dwindles, cooperation is missing, and ad hoc interactions are commonplace. That creates chaos. No one appears in charge even though there is someone responsible. It clearly is a sign of broken communication channels. A well-orchestrated workplace focuses on methods to communicate bottom-up and top-down. It encourages patient listening, internalizing, and responding rather than reacting. All effective open communication channels are a result of making such communication possible. Often, the structures are set such that you centralize communication of every bit of your activity to someone in the hierarchy. Over time, it turns into a permission-based...

Top up.

An effort of any kind will stop without a top-up mechanism. The cooking range doesn't work without gas. When petrol runs out, vehicles don't work. In the absence of solar panels, green energy is just a dream. Such issues apply to us humans too. Our ability to work hampers seriously if we don't have an energy replenishment plan. We think we enjoy the most when we do work involving our passions. We think tirelessly doing the same activity will keep our enthusiasm. Like writer's block, there comes a day when our ideas don't work. Monotony dries up the fun. What used to be the reason to be at work feels like the most dreaded place. When we encounter such a situation, it's time to check if our energy tank is emptying out fast enough that we need to land to refuel. Top up is a vital periodic part that recharges us. Different activities, places or people might refuel us with new energy and ideas. But first, be open to knowing you will run out of fuel. Sooner or later, ...

Checks and balances!

Defining a good purpose, setting a target goal and getting people working on them is usually not enough! There are too many aspects involved in getting the results we want. For example, there is an aspect of painting the big picture, working on motivation management, productivity tracking, building experimentation labs, and erecting resilient systems that systematize the workflows. Just putting bodies to work and defining milestones rarely achieves the right results. The other aspects that help march towards the milestones in an orderly manner, they are equally important. At the very least, they make objectives widely understandable and results more attainable. The job of a thought leader is to enable progress and enable recovery. Therefore, it is never enough to have just ideas. Those with ideas also have the responsibility to assemble the work environment in such a way as to create situations containing the energy disperses. Energy dispersal from lack of clarity, loss of motivation, ...