Skip to main content

What really is the root cause?

By Bamboo In The Wind

We tend to act on a superficial understanding of the problem and create solutions for the effects we get from the problem than the root cause of the problem. This is hugely expensive. The same results of the problems revisit in no time.

A well-running paper manufacturing factory in a rural area ran into unexpected downtime. The reason? The paper sheets began to tear apart as the sheet traveled for the final paper rolling process. The factory supplies paper to the Print media and packaging industry.

The management team ordered a thorough investigation of the breakdown.

The investigation went something like this:

They asked why the sheets started to tear apart, and the answer was some water drops fell on the paper and softened, and the sheets began to break apart.

"Why did water drops fall on the paper?" 

"The water pipe beside the production line carrying paper had rusted."

"Why did the water pipe rust?" 

"Because the water pipe was old, it required maintenance by greasing the couplings that connected the pipes. Leakage happened in the joint."

"Why then was maintenance not done?" 

"Well, maintenance budget approval held up the maintenance vendor purchase order."

You get the point. What was the breakdown in the production process?

Water leakage...? Maintenance of water pipes?, Or overdue maintenance budget approval? It depends on whether you want a symptomatic cause or the root cause. There is no point in fixing the results of the problems.

Ditto for anything and everything we do.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Choking the communication channel.

By Bamboo In The Wind
There are instances where everything looks in order. Structures are rightly in place. Right roles are defined. Responsibilities are distributed. Bi-directional open communication is expected to take place. And with that, collective work is expected to turn out productive. Yet, when the action begins, everything breaks apart. Productivity dwindles, cooperation is missing, and ad-hoc interactions are common-place That creates chaos. No one appears in charge even though there is someone responsible. It clearly is a sign of broken communication channels. A well-orchestrated workplace focuses on methods to communicate grounds-up and top-down. It encourages patient listening, internalizing and responding rather than reacting. All effective open communication channels are a result of making such communication possible. Often, the structures are set such that you centralize communication of every bit of your activity to someone in the hierarchy. Over time it turns into a permission-based inter...
1 comment
Next »

Top up.

By Bamboo In The Wind
An effort of any kind will stop without a top-up mechanism. The cooking range doesn't work without gas. When petrol runs out, vehicles don't work. In the absence of solar panels, green energy is just a dream. Such issues apply to us humans too. Our ability to work hampers seriously if we don't have an energy replenishment plan. We think we enjoy the most when we do work involving our passions. We think tirelessly doing the same activity will keep our enthusiasm. Like writer's block, there comes a day when our ideas don't work. Monotony dries up the fun. What used to be the reason to be at work feels like the most dreaded place. When we encounter such a situation, it's time to check if our energy tank is emptying out fast enough that we need to land to refuel. Top up is a vital periodic part that recharges us. Different activities, places or people might refuel us with new energy and ideas. But first, be open to knowing you will run out of fuel. Sooner or later, ...
1 comment
Next »

Checks and balances!

By Bamboo In The Wind
Defining a good purpose, setting a target goal and getting people working on them is usually not enough! There are too many aspects involved in getting the results we want. For example, there is an aspect of painting the big picture, working on motivation management, productivity tracking, building experimentation labs, and erecting resilient systems that systematize the workflows. Just putting bodies to work and defining milestones rarely achieves the right results. The other aspects that help march towards the milestones in an orderly manner, they are equally important. At the very least, they make objectives widely understandable and results more attainable. The job of a thought leader is to enable progress and enable recovery. Therefore, it is never enough to have just ideas. Those with ideas also have the responsibility to assemble the work environment in such a way as to create situations containing the energy disperses. Energy dispersal from lack of clarity, loss of motivation, ...
Post a Comment
Next »