Skip to main content

Logical Approach or Path of Least Resistance?

When faced with complex problems, we never ask what is perfect, best, or care to find the most appropriate answer.

Instead, we find a way to answer the question that will require less effort, isn't the most efficient, and yet less discomforting!

Taking the path of least resistance is definitely in fashion. We try to solve the problem, which is usually suitable for optics.

But the intended effect of our problem may not solve the problem. But by then, the onlookers have moved away, making an opinion of our good intentions and patting our back for our efforts!

If we intended to solve the problem, why fall prey to playing to the gallery?

There are a few reasons:

  • It's hard to grapple with uncertainty. Elimination of doubt requires taking action or having some opinions. It gives us a sense of having done something to solve the problem. It's easy, convenient, and eliminates discomfort, but the problem persists.
  • Many times causes are complex and intertwined. Giving simple reasons gives a way to create an action to solve the problem. However, the lack of understanding of the intricacies causing the issue makes the approach a temporary relief instead of a solution.
  • The most critical reason we like to take a path of least resistance is we think everyone sees, feels, and acts exactly the way we would. It is too simplistic and yet easy to explain to ourselves.
Solving the problem at its roots means we uncover the uncertainty around the issue, understand the reasons for it, and have an understanding of others close to the problem would view our decisions and actions.

The logical approach is the best way to address most problems we grapple with.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Choking the communication channel.

There are instances where everything looks in order. Structures are rightly in place. Right roles are defined. Responsibilities are distributed. Bi-directional open communication is expected to take place. And with that, collective work is expected to turn out productive. Yet, when the action begins, everything breaks apart. Productivity dwindles, cooperation is missing, and ad-hoc interactions are common-place That creates chaos. No one appears in charge even though there is someone responsible. It clearly is a sign of broken communication channels. A well-orchestrated workplace focuses on methods to communicate grounds-up and top-down. It encourages patient listening, internalizing and responding rather than reacting. All effective open communication channels are a result of making such communication possible. Often, the structures are set such that you centralize communication of every bit of your activity to someone in the hierarchy. Over time it turns into a permission-based inter...

Top up.

An effort of any kind will stop without a top-up mechanism. The cooking range doesn't work without gas. When petrol runs out, vehicles don't work. In the absence of solar panels, green energy is just a dream. Such issues apply to us humans too. Our ability to work hampers seriously if we don't have an energy replenishment plan. We think we enjoy the most when we do work involving our passions. We think tirelessly doing the same activity will keep our enthusiasm. Like writer's block, there comes a day when our ideas don't work. Monotony dries up the fun. What used to be the reason to be at work feels like the most dreaded place. When we encounter such a situation, it's time to check if our energy tank is emptying out fast enough that we need to land to refuel. Top up is a vital periodic part that recharges us. Different activities, places or people might refuel us with new energy and ideas. But first, be open to knowing you will run out of fuel. Sooner or later, ...

Checks and balances!

Defining a good purpose, setting a target goal and getting people working on them is usually not enough! There are too many aspects involved in getting the results we want. For example, there is an aspect of painting the big picture, working on motivation management, productivity tracking, building experimentation labs, and erecting resilient systems that systematize the workflows. Just putting bodies to work and defining milestones rarely achieves the right results. The other aspects that help march towards the milestones in an orderly manner, they are equally important. At the very least, they make objectives widely understandable and results more attainable. The job of a thought leader is to enable progress and enable recovery. Therefore, it is never enough to have just ideas. Those with ideas also have the responsibility to assemble the work environment in such a way as to create situations containing the energy disperses. Energy dispersal from lack of clarity, loss of motivation, ...